More Routing

I tried to traceroute someone who is a Comcast customer in TN to see what kind of route it would take. This gets really interesting.

  2   134 ms   185 ms   169 ms c-3-0-ubr05.boston.ma.boston.comcast.net [73.168.144.1]
  3   *    102 ms   192 ms ge-2-39-ur01.boston.ma.boston.comcast.net [68.87.158.33]
  4   152 ms   142 ms   162 ms te-8-1-ur01.brookline.ma.boston.comcast.net [68.87.144.57]
  5   187 ms   200 ms   183 ms te-8-3-ar01.needham.ma.boston.comcast.net [68.87.144.53]
  6   25 ms   15 ms   15 ms 12.116.130.173
  7   185 ms   *    245 ms br2.cb1ma.ip.att.net [12.127.5.26]
  8   227 ms   181 ms   226 ms tbr2.n54ny.ip.att.net [12.122.10.22]
  9   *    40 ms   117 ms tbr2.wswdc.ip.att.net [12.122.10.54]
10   209 ms   216 ms   275 ms 12.122.16.77
11   202 ms   166 ms   165 ms cr1.attga.ip.att.net [12.122.1.173]
12   224 ms   179 ms   245 ms tbr1.attga.ip.att.net [12.122.12.30]
13   235 ms   251 ms   206 ms ar5.attga.ip.att.net [12.123.20.233]
14   230 ms   149 ms   185 ms 12.116.236.50
15   56 ms   69 ms   279 ms te-9-1-ur01.goodslettvll.tn.nash.comcast.net [68.86.148.22]
16   215 ms   201 ms   259 ms te-9-3-ur01.gallatin.tn.nash.comcast.net [68.86.148.62]
17   256 ms   137 ms   183 ms te-9-2-ur01.tulipgrove.tn.nash.comcast.net [68.86.148.78]
18   212 ms   223 ms   181 ms te-9-2-ur01.blebanonrd.tn.nash.comcast.net [68.86.148.86]
19   122 ms   191 ms   231 ms te-9-2-ur02.ashgroverd.tn.nash.comcast.net [68.86.148.58]
20   215 ms   165 ms   249 ms te-9-2-ur01.ashgroverd.tn.nash.comcast.net [68.86.148.53]
21   112 ms   217 ms   194 ms te-9-2-ur01.ruralhillrd.tn.nash.comcast.net [68.86.148.50]

It looks like my traffic bounced off the Comcast network in Needham and bounced onto the AT&T network from New York to Georgia and then back onto the Comcast network in Nashville.

Look at what happens when I tried to traceroute a Comcast customer in CA.

  2   200 ms   116 ms   194 ms c-3-0-ubr05.boston.ma.boston.comcast.net [73.168.144.1]
  3   66 ms   157 ms   196 ms ge-2-39-ur01.boston.ma.boston.comcast.net [68.87.158.33]
  4   7 ms   7 ms   11 ms te-8-1-ur01.brookline.ma.boston.comcast.net [68.87.144.57]
  5   91 ms   247 ms   156 ms te-8-3-ar01.needham.ma.boston.comcast.net [68.87.144.53]
  6   193 ms   139 ms   168 ms po-11-ar02.needham.ma.boston.comcast.net [68.87.146.38]
  7   11 ms   11 ms   8 ms po-12-ar02.woburn.ma.boston.comcast.net [68.87.146.46]
  8   196 ms   205 ms   153 ms po-10-ar01.woburn.ma.boston.comcast.net [68.87.146.41]
  9   169 ms   11 ms   10 ms te-4-1-cr01.boston.ma.cbone.comcast.net [68.86.72.25]
10   143 ms   219 ms   212 ms te-9-1-cr01.cleveland.oh.cbone.comcast.net [68.86.68.14]
11   86 ms   146 ms   260 ms te-9-1-cr01.chicago.il.cbone.comcast.net [68.86.68.22]
12   204 ms   137 ms   143 ms te-9-1-cr01.omaha.ne.cbone.comcast.net [68.86.68.30]
13   241 ms   174 ms   *    te-9-1-cr01.denver.co.cbone.comcast.net [68.86.68.42]
14   66 ms   70 ms   118 ms te-9-1-cr01.denverqwest.co.cbone.comcast.net [68.86.68.146]
15   247 ms   257 ms   141 ms te-9-1-cr01.alburquerque.nm.cbone.comcast.net [68.86.68.150]
16   280 ms   295 ms   247 ms te-8-1-cr01.losangeles.ca.cbone.comcast.net [68.86.68.81]
17   242 ms   165 ms   259 ms te-1-1-cr01.sanjose.ca.cbone.comcast.net [68.86.68.73]
18   153 ms   286 ms   282 ms 68.86.143.2
19   257 ms   283 ms   266 ms te-9-1-ur01.sfsutro.ca.sfba.comcast.net [68.87.192.198]
20   207 ms   265 ms   275 ms te-8-1-ur02.sfsutro.ca.sfba.comcast.net [68.87.226.46]
21   301 ms   265 ms   201 ms te-9-3-ur01.sffolsom.ca.sfba.comcast.net [68.87.192.202]

This time, instead of going to Hartford via Springfield, the Comcast traffic got routed to Woburn after Needham. From there, it looks like it traveled along Comcast’s “cbone” which I would assume is one of their backbones. It went back into Boston before heading to Cleveland, Chicago, Omaha, Denver, Alburquerque, Los Angeles, and San Jose, before hitting the SFBA (San Francisco Bay Area?) network.

I’m not sure why, but I find the whole concept of data routing fascinating at the moment. Maybe it’s because I can’t sleep.